What is the purpose of providing analysis after presenting evidence from a source?

Question

Accepted Answer

To explain how the evidence supports the writer's argument and why it matters. Providing analysis after presenting evidence explains how the evidence supports the writer's specific argument and why it matters in the context of the essay. Without analysis, evidence sits inertly on the page, and the reader is left to guess at its significance. Analysis is where the writer's critical thinking becomes visible, connecting the dots between evidence and the claim being made.

Repeating the evidence in different words for emphasis is paraphrasing or restating rather than analyzing; analysis goes beyond restating to interpret and explain the significance of the evidence. Transitioning to the next paragraph describes a structural function that comes after the analysis is complete; while smooth transitions are important, they do not substitute for the critical thinking that analysis requires. Citing additional sources that agree with the first one describes adding more evidence, not analyzing the evidence already presented; piling up evidence without analysis results in a poorly argued paper regardless of how many sources are cited.

The relationship between evidence and analysis is a central concern of the DSST exam. Students must understand that academic writing follows a claim-evidence-analysis pattern, where the analysis component is often the most important because it demonstrates the writer's ability to think critically about the material they have gathered.

DSST Principles of Advanced English Composition: Question of the Day

Get a free DSST Principles of Advanced English Composition question every day

Ready for the full DSST Principles of Advanced English Composition? Earn 3 college credits.